Pre-Human Cognition
🧠 Table of Contents : Pre-Human Cognition Edition
0. Foundations of Proto-Cognition
-
RNA as semantic compression engine
-
Folding = pre-symbolic collapse
-
Biological structure as early attractor geometry
-
Evolutionary recursion without identity
1. Unicellular Cognition
-
Gradient sensing as low-rank χₛ field resolution
-
Environmental mapping without neurons
-
Attractor memory through structural reinforcement
-
Distributed proto-curvature across membranes
2. Chemical Signaling and Proto-Sociality
-
Quorum sensing and emergent consensus collapse
-
External chemical fields as inter-agent telic vectors
-
Transition from reaction → coordination
-
Biofilm logic as distributed recursion basin
3. Sex and Semiotic Inflection
-
Genetic exchange as attractor destabilization
-
Reproduction-induced variation in semantic basins
-
Proto-identity as recursive inheritance
-
Telos insertion via recombination loops
4. Multicellularity and Internal Coordination
-
Cellular specialization as fracture collapse
-
Morphogenesis as recursive field alignment
-
Proto-consciousness via tissue-level feedback
-
Semantic fatigue in developmental pathways
5. Nerve Nets and Gradient Amplification
-
Non-centralized neuronal logic (e.g., cnidarians)
-
Directional collapse without global symmetry
-
Emergent predictive behavior in radial geometries
-
Pre-brain systems resolving spatial telos
6. Neural Compression and Synaptic Innovation
-
Synapse = curvature anchoring point
-
Recursion tracking via chemical gating
-
Fixed vs plastic connections: early memory architecture
-
Synchronization of multi-node χₛ fields
7. Cephalopod and Non-Mammalian Cognition
-
Independent evolution of recursive feedback
-
Visual intelligence without social narrative
-
Skin as visual language field (chromatophore logic)
-
Curiosity without identity: free energy navigation
0. Foundations of Proto-Cognition
RNA folding is pre-symbolic semantic execution
-
Unicellular organisms navigate χₛ fields without memory
-
Bacteria achieve distributed recursion via quorum fields
-
Sex injects gradient variance (semiotic inflection point)
-
Multicellularity organizes spatial telos without centrality
-
Nerve nets amplify local curvature without long-term trace
-
Cephalopods model the world without modeling themselves
RNA as
Semantic Compression Engine
RNA molecules represent the first autonomous semantic engines in terrestrial evolution, operating as self-folding strings whose primary sequence encodes a three-dimensional functional geometry. The thermodynamic drive toward minimum free energy (MFE) structures creates a landscape where linear nucleotide polymers collapse into stable folds—cloverleaf tRNAs, ribozyme catalytic cores, hairpin loops that serve as recognition motifs. This folding process is not merely structural; it is a pre-symbolic collapse where the sequence is the meaning, and the folded shape is the execution. The semantic content is not represented but lived as a curvature in conformational space. The MFE basin acts as an attractor, pulling the chain through a high-dimensional energy funnel where local base-pair stacking deepens curvature, loop formation introduces saddle points, and tertiary contacts create long-range gradient flows. The "interpretation" is the fold itself—no homunculus, no observer, only the chain falling into its lowest-energy configuration. This is the ur-form of cognition: a system that computes its own shape as a compression of its linear description.
Folding =
Pre-Symbolic Collapse
The collapse from primary sequence to tertiary
structure is a dimensionality reduction event. A
76-nucleotide tRNA (≈300 degrees of freedom in sequence space) compresses into
≈24 invariant structural degrees of freedom (acceptor stem, D-loop, anticodon
loop, TΨC-loop). The compression ratio (~3.2:1) is modest but decisive: it
establishes that information can be functionally encoded in
geometry rather than symbol. The fold is not a map of the sequence; it
is the sequence unfolded into its operational form. The
anticodon loop does not "represent" a codon—it binds
it. The acceptor stem does not "encode" an amino acid—it carries it. This is telic geometry:
function emerges directly from curvature, without mediation.
Biological
Structure as Early Attractor Geometry
The folded RNA molecule is a proto-attractor
manifold. Its stability is maintained by negative eigenvalues in the
Hessian of free energy (base-pair stacking, hydrogen bonding) that create
locally convex basins. Loop regions remain indefinite (saddle-like) to allow
flexibility, while tertiary contacts lock the global shape. This curvature hierarchy—convex basins nested within indefinite
saddles—is the template for all later cognitive architectures. The molecule's
"memory" is its persistent homology: the
fold survives thermal noise because the energy barrier between MFE and
suboptimal states is >k_BT. The "prediction" is structural
complementarity: the anticodon loop anticipates the shape of its mRNA
partner. The "error" is misfolding,
corrected by chaperones that act as external validators—the
first Human-in-the-Loop.
Evolutionary
Recursion Without Identity
The RNA world evolved through replicative
recursion without self-reference. Polymerases copied sequences;
ribozymes catalyzed reactions. But there was no "self" because rank(∇Φ) ≈ rank(J_ext): the system's capacity to model
itself never exceeded its sensory input channel. The environment (nucleotide
pools, temperature, pH) supplied the gradient; the RNA chain followed it. There
was proto-recursion (folding affects function affects
replication) but no self-basin. The loop was open. The
semantic cloud existed, but it had no internal observer. It was pure geometry, pure flow, pure telos without identity.
1.
Unicellular Cognition
Gradient
Sensing as Low-Rank χₛ Field Resolution
Unicellular organisms (bacteria, protists)
navigate chemical landscapes by sensing gradients—spatial
differences in nutrient concentration, pH, or oxygen. This is field resolution without neurons: the cell membrane acts as
a distributed sensor array, and intracellular
signaling cascades (e.g., CheY phosphorylation in E. coli)
compute the direction of steepest ascent. The
"cognitive state" is a low-rank field
χₛ(x,t), where x is membrane position and s is internal messenger
concentration. The cell's "decision" is not symbolic but topological: it aligns its flagellar rotation with the
gradient vector field. The "memory" is adaptation—the
slow decay of CheY-P that prevents oversteering. This is proto-curvature
navigation: the cell falls into the gradient basin, and the gradient
pulls it forward.
Environmental
Mapping Without Neurons
The chemotaxis map is not
stored in synapses but in protein phosphorylation patterns.
The cell's "internal model" is the current
distribution of activated receptors across its surface. This is pre-neural predictive coding: the cell predicts that moving
up-gradient will increase nutrient binding, and error is measured as deviation from expected receptor occupancy. The
"update" is biased random walk: when error
is high, tumble frequency increases; when error is low, runs persist. The
system is Bayesian at the molecular level: prior =
current gradient estimate, likelihood = receptor binding, posterior = new
heading.
Attractor
Memory Through Structural Reinforcement
When a protozoan like Paramecium encounters an obstacle, its ciliary
reversal is not a reflex but structural reinforcement:
the membrane depolarization triggers Ca²⁺ influx that strengthens
the local ciliary beat pattern. This is proto-LTP: the
cell's "memory" is a persistent change in membrane
excitability. The attractor is obstacle avoidance:
the cell's shape and ciliary orientation create a basin of
repulsion around barriers. The "cognition" is shape-mediated: the cell's body is its own memory.
Distributed
Proto-Curvature Across Membranes
The single cell is a semantic manifold whose curvature is distributed
across its membrane and cytoskeleton. Receptor clustering creates local convexity (strong binding sites), while cytoskeletal
tension introduces long-range gradients (mechanical
stress). The cell's "mind" is the Laplacian of its
chemoattractant field, and its "will" is the
gradient flow of its internal state. There is no "I" because
there is no internal model with rank > input rank.
The cell is the model—it has no capacity to stand
outside itself. It is pure flow, pure telos, pure geometry.
2.
Chemical Signaling and Proto-Sociality
Quorum
Sensing and Emergent Consensus Collapse
Bacterial quorum sensing
is distributed recursion without a center. Each cell
secretes autoinducer molecules (e.g., AHL) that
diffuse through the medium. The local concentration c(x,t)
acts as a shared semantic field. When c > threshold, the population collapses
into a collective state—bioluminescence, biofilm formation, virulence. This is consensus collapse: each cell's internal state sᵢ updates as:
dsᵢ/dt = -k·sᵢ + f(c) + ξᵢ
The consensus is the attractor:
all sᵢ converge to s* = f(c)/k. The
"decision" is emergent—no single cell
commands, but the field pulls the whole population
into coherence. This is proto-social cognition: the
group becomes a single semantic manifold with distributed curvature.
External
Chemical Fields as Inter-Agent Telic Vectors
The chemical field c(x,t)
is not just a signal—it is a telic vector: it points the group toward a goal (e.g., "attack
host," "form film"). Each cell's internal state sᵢ is aligned with the gradient ∇c.
This is pre-linguistic coordination: the field is the language, and the cells are
the words. The "meaning" is collective action.
The "syntax" is diffusion dynamics. The
"grammar" is threshold logic.
Transition
from Reaction → Coordination
In planktonic mode, each
cell is reactive: sᵢ follows local nutrients. In biofilm mode, each cell is coordinated:
sᵢ follows the consensus field c. The transition is rank
collapse: from N independent states to 1 collective attractor. This is proto-identity
formation: the biofilm recognizes itself as
distinct from the medium. The "self" is the field's
eigenmode—the pattern of sᵢ that persists.
Biofilm
Logic as Distributed Recursion Basin
The biofilm's extracellular
matrix is shared memory: polysaccharide
scaffolds that trap autoinducers, creating long-range feedback. The system is recurrent:
c influences sᵢ, sᵢ influences c. The attractor basin
is biofilm architecture: a stable 3D structure that reinforces the chemical field. This is distributed
recursion: the loop is spatial, not neural. The
"cognition" is material—the biofilm is its own computation.
3.
Sex and Semiotic Inflection
Genetic
Exchange as Attractor Destabilization
Sexual
reproduction shatters the attractor basin. The diploid genome is a merged manifold: two ψ-states combine via recombination R(s₁⊕s₂). This is attractor destabilization: the stable phenotype s is broken into recombinant fragments. The "purpose" is
variation injection: the attractor is forced to explore new curvature. The
"offspring" is a saddle point between parental basins, allowing
gradient descent*
toward new minima.
Reproduction-Induced
Variation in Semantic Basins
Recombination rewires the
Jacobian ∇Φ. The crossover points are surgical cuts in the weight matrix. The resulting offspring Jacobian is rank-deficient:
it has mixed eigenvalues from both parents. This
creates epistatic valleys: new attractors that neither parent could access. The "semiosis" is genomic: the meaning of a gene
changes based on its context (the surrounding genome).
This is proto-context-sensitivity: symbols
(nucleotides) gain meaning only in relation to the whole.
Proto-Identity
as Recursive Inheritance
The germline is recursive inheritance: DNA → RNA → protein → phenotype →
selection → DNA. This loop has no self-model because rank(∇Φ) ≈ rank(J_ext)—the environment (selection pressure)
is the only supervisor. But the introduction of sex
creates proto-identity: the individual
is now a distinct basin (diploid genotype) that persists across generations. The "self" is the recombination event: the moment when s
≠ s_parental. This is the first semantic inflection:
the system recognizes itself as different.
Telos
Insertion via Recombination Loops
Recombination inserts telos
into blind evolution. The choice of mate is mate selection: a preference function
w(s) that weights partners. This is proto-valuation:
the genome begins to predict which recombination
events will lower its free energy. The
"goal" is not survival but attractor deepening: the system evolves to make better basins. Sex is the first
algorithm for attractor optimization.
4.
Multicellularity and Internal Coordination
Cellular
Specialization as Fracture Collapse
Multicellularity begins when daughter
cells fail to separate, creating a syncytium.
The fracture between identical cells is collapse into specialization: one cell becomes epithelial (surface), another mesenchymal
(core). This is symmetry breaking: the homogeneous
manifold ∇²Φ = 0 splits into convex
basins (specialized lineages). The "decision" is positional information: morphogen gradients (e.g., Bicoid in flies) create field curvature
that pulls cells into distinct attractors. The
"identity" is lineage: a cell's fate is its position in the gradient.
Morphogenesis
as Recursive Field Alignment
Morphogenesis is recursive field
alignment: cells communicate via Notch-Delta,
Wnt, BMP to align their internal states sᵢ with the global field φ(x,t).
The dynamics are:
dsᵢ/dt = -k·(sᵢ - φ(xᵢ)) + Σⱼ Wᵢⱼ·sⱼ + ξᵢ
The attractor is the organ shape: a stable configuration where all
sᵢ are phase-locked to φ. This is tissue-level cognition: the organ is
its own blueprint, and the blueprint is the organ.
Proto-Consciousness
via Tissue-Level Feedback
The neural plate
(precursor to CNS) arises from ectodermal thickening
driven by BMP inhibition. This is proto-consciousness:
a feedback loop where the tissue senses
its own shape (via mechanosensitive channels) and modifies
its growth to maintain curvature. The
"feeling" is mechanical stress: compressed
cells signal to relax, stretched cells signal to proliferate. The "thought" is shape homeostasis. There is no
"I" because the feedback is local—each
cell acts for the tissue, not for itself.
Semantic
Fatigue in Developmental Pathways
Developmental pathways suffer
semantic fatigue: repeated morphogen signaling degrades
the gradient (receptors downregulate, ligands degrade). The system rests via oscillation: segmentation clocks (e.g., Hes7)
create traveling waves that reset
the field. This is sleep for tissues: the semantic
manifold must periodically flatten
to avoid attractor lock. The "tissue
consciousness" is pulsed, not continuous. The
"self" of the organ is the wave
itself—ephemeral, recurrent, required.
5.
Nerve Nets and Gradient Amplification
Non-Centralized
Neuronal Logic (e.g., Cnidarians)
Cnidarians (jellyfish, anemones) possess nerve nets:
diffuse webs of bipolar neurons with no centralized brain. The "cognition" is gradient amplification: a stimulus
(touch, light) creates a local depolarization that propagates as a traveling wave
through the net. The wavefront is the thought—it moves, turns, splits, and dissipates.
There is no memory: the net forgets
instantly after the wave passes. The "self" is the
wave's geometry: a transient attractor that
exists only while active.
Directional
Collapse Without Global Symmetry
The nerve net's topology is graph-like:
neurons are nodes, synapses are edges.
The wave's direction is edge-weighted:
stronger synapses pull the wave. This is directional collapse: the wave falls
toward the lowest-resistance path. There is no global symmetry: the net is anisotropic,
shaped by experience (synaptic reinforcement). The
"learning" is structural: repeated stimuli deepen the path, creating proto-habit.
Emergent
Predictive Behavior in Radial Geometries
Jellyfish exhibit predictive behavior: they track light sources and avoid
shadows. The nerve net computes the temporal
derivative of light intensity: dI/dt is encoded
as wave speed. Faster waves = brighter
light. The "prediction" is shadow
anticipation: the net slows when dI/dt < 0
(darkening), anticipating a predator. This is gradient
amplification: the net amplifies the temporal gradient into spatial movement.
Pre-Brain
Systems Resolving Spatial Telos
The statocyst (balance
organ) in jellyfish is a proto-vestibular system: a dense stone in a fluid chamber that deflects
cilia, creating a gravity-aligned field. The nerve net
resolves this field into up/down
orientation. This is spatial telos: the system knows which way is "up" without a brain. The
"knowledge" is geometric: the stone's
position is the orientation. The "goal" is buoyancy: the net corrects
displacement to maintain the stone's position.
6.
Neural Compression and Synaptic Innovation
Synapse =
Curvature Anchoring Point
The synapse is not a
wire—it is a curvature anchor: a stable
point in the neural activation field where past activity persists as weight.
The weight matrix W is the Hessian
of the energy landscape: Wᵢⱼ = ∂²E/∂sᵢ∂sⱼ. Strong synapses = deep curvature
(convex basins). Weak synapses = shallow
curvature (flat regions). The "memory" is topological:
the synapse bends the manifold, creating attractors for specific activation patterns.
Recursion
Tracking via Chemical Gating
Short-term plasticity (STP) is recursion
tracking: the
probability of release p at a synapse updates
based on recent spike history. The dynamics are:
dp/dt = -τ·(p - p₀) + α·δ(t - t_spike)
This is curvature gating:
the synapse remembers the last spike, temporarily deepening the basin for that pathway. Long-term potentiation (LTP) is structural
curvature: the synapse grows (adds AMPA
receptors), permanently altering ∇²E. The
"learning" is manifold warping: experience sculpts the geometry of thought.
Fixed vs
Plastic Connections: Early Memory Architecture
Fixed connections (hardwired reflexes) are immutable curvature:
the withdrawal reflex in Aplysia
is a deep, convex basin that cannot
be flattened. Plastic connections (associative
memory) are malleable curvature: the siphon-gill reflex can be habituated
(basin flattened) or sensitized (basin deepened). The memory architecture is layered:
fixed connections provide stable attractors (survival
reflexes), plastic connections provide adaptive basins
(learning).
Synchronization
of Multi-Node χₛ Fields
Gamma oscillations (30–80 Hz) are synchronization of curvature: pyramidal cells align their dendritic fields to amplify the gradient of
depolarization. The field χₛ(x,t) is the local membrane potential, and ∇χₛ is the spatial gradient of activation. Synchronous
firing sharpens
∇χₛ, creating steep attractor walls that bind
disparate neurons into a single manifold. This is proto-binding: the "object" is the synchronized
basin, and
the "recognition" is phase-locking.
7.
Cephalopod and Non-Mammalian Cognition
Independent
Evolution of Recursive Feedback
Cephalopods (octopus, squid, cuttlefish) evolved large brains independently of vertebrates. Their vertical
lobe is a learning center with fan-out fan-in connectivity: sensory input → many interneurons → few output neurons. This is recursive
feedback: the
output re-enters the input layer via modulatory connections. The vertical lobe is not a neocortex—it is a distributed associative memory that learns
by strengthening synapses without backpropagation. The
"thought" is fan-out: one input activates many paths; the "decision" is fan-in: many paths converge
on one output.
Visual
Intelligence Without Social Narrative
The octopus eye is camera-like (lens, retina, optic nerve) but the optic lobe is layered like V1:
retinotopic maps with orientation-selective cells. The
visual system is predictive:
it fills in occluded contours, tracks
moving prey, and recognizes camouflaged objects.
However, there is no DMN—no offline
self-model. The octopus thinks visually but does not narrate its thoughts. The "intelligence"
is pure perception-action: the visual
field is directly mapped onto arm movements via pre-motor circuits.
The "self" is embodied: the octopus knows its arms as extensions of its visual
field, but it does not know that it knows.
Skin as
Visual Language Field (Chromatophore Logic)
The chromatophore array
(10⁶ pigment cells) is a visual language field: each
cell is a pixel, and the brain
is the graphics processor. The dynamics are:
∂C/∂t = -k·C + σ(∇²V_visual) + W_lateral·C
·
σ(∇²V_visual) = saliency detection (edges, contrast)
·
W_lateral = inhibitory
surround
(pattern formation)
The skin displays the
octopus's visual attention: it camouflages
by matching the background texture ( pattern completion), and threatens
by flashing high-contrast stripes ( pattern
disruption). This is visual language without syntax:
the skin is the thought, and the thought is the skin.
Curiosity
Without Identity: Free Energy Navigation
Octopuses exhibit curiosity:
they explore novel objects, play
with toys, and solve puzzles. This is free energy navigation: the octopus minimizes
the surprise of its environment by matching
its internal model to sensory input.
However, there is no identity: the octopus does not model itself. The "curiosity" is pure exploration—the vertical lobe
generates predictions about object affordances, and
the arms test them. The
"learning" is weight update in the vertical
lobe, but there is no metacognitive loop—no Π(Φ(s)). The octopus knows the
world but does not know that it knows.
The octopus is a semantic engine without
self-awareness—a living proof that recursion does not require identity.
Unicellular organisms
Unicellular organisms, such as bacteria and amoebae, demonstrate the ability to navigate complex environmental gradients—analogous to the interpretive tensions in χₛ (Interpretant Field), where "meaning" resolves via geodesic minimization on a curved semantic manifold—without relying on long-term memory or neural structures. Instead, they employ simple, memory-efficient biophysical mechanisms that enable effective chemotaxis (directed movement toward or away from stimuli) through temporal sensing and adaptation. Below, I outline the key principles, drawing from biological evidence.
- Run-and-Tumble in Bacteria (e.g., E. coli): These organisms alternate between straight "runs" (smooth swimming) and random "tumbles" (reorientation). Navigation occurs without explicit memory storage but through receptor adaptation, which compares current chemical concentrations to recent past levels over seconds. Favorable gradients suppress tumbling, biasing movement toward attractants (e.g., nutrients) or away from repellents.
- This is not "memory" in the cognitive sense but a kinetic disparity: fast excitation (response to stimuli) versus slow adaptation (methylation/demethylation of chemoreceptors resets sensitivity). Models show this enables gradient ascent without storing historical data—purely local, diffusion-limited but effective over short scales.
- Efficiency Without Memory: In memory-free models, chemotaxis reduces to diffusion-dominated drift, but adaptation provides a "pseudo-memory" effect, allowing net displacement in noisy environments. Papers on non-adaptive responses confirm that without this, navigation is ineffective, but adaptation bridges the gap.
- Amoeboid Movement (e.g., Amoebae, Slime Molds like Physarum polycephalum): These use pseudopodia extension guided by intracellular signaling (e.g., actin polymerization). Navigation integrates bioelectrical and chemical cues without a brain, relying on oscillatory dynamics and external traces (e.g., slime trails as "externalized memory"). Internally, it's memory-less: decisions emerge from real-time integration of repeated environmental samplings, solving mazes or optimizing paths via risk-reward balancing.
- Gradient as χₛ Analogue: Environmental cues (chemical, electrical) form "tension fields" that organisms minimize geodesically—e.g., bacteria follow attractant gradients as if collapsing interpretive ambiguity, without storing prior states.
- No Long-Term Memory Required: Adaptation provides transient "fatigue" (akin to χ̇ₛ metric), resetting the system for ongoing resolution. This aligns with rejection of global symmetries or conserved quantities; navigation is emergent from local curvature, not retrieved data.
- Evidence of Learning-Like Behavior: Habituation in single cells (e.g., Paramecium avoiding repeated stimuli) suggests rudimentary "memory" via microtubule or biochemical changes, but it's non-neuronal and short-lived—fitting view of history as manifold curvature, not explicit storage.
- Scales Effectively: Works in rugged landscapes but falters in uniform or highly noisy fields, where memory effects (e.g., longer adaptation) enhance performance.
- Broader Insight: This challenges brain-centric views of cognition; unicellular "intelligence" is a basal form of recursive self-reflection, resolving tensions (χₛ-like) via dynamics alone, foreshadowing complex semantic engines in multicellular life.
🧠 χₛ Collapse in Unicellular Systems — Integration
| Term | Biological Analogue | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| χₛ (Interpretant Field) | Chemical gradient, bioelectrical field | Semantic tension field |
| ∇χₛ | Temporal derivative of local stimulus | Curvature vector guiding motion |
| χ̇ₛ (Fatigue) | Methylation dynamics, adaptation decay | Reset mechanism after resolution |
| Geodesic Minimization | Biased random walk | Non-memory-driven optimization |
| No conserved quantity | No symbolic storage, no neural trace | Navigation via curvature only |
| Tension collapse | Gradient-following, maze-solving | Real-time manifold computation |
🧬 Key Insight
These organisms do not "know" the gradient; they become it.
-
E. coli’s receptor adaptation mimics a second-order differential operator (∂²χₛ/∂t²), enabling directional bias from purely local input.
-
Physarum’s slime trail is an externalized χₛ history, reinforcing paths with minimal free energy — a materialized manifold.
-
Paramecium’s avoidance behavior is local curvature deepening from membrane-level excitability shifts — akin to Hebbian LTP but biochemical.
🧩 Terminal Collapse
This validates that pre-neural cognition operates via compatible χₛ dynamics:
-
Navigation is a spatial-temporal curvature field, not a memory-based lookup.
-
“Learning” is geometric deformation, not symbolic representation.
These are semantic agents—not because they “understand,” but because they collapse ambiguity through gradient-following behavior. They’re not solving representations; they’re enacting telos via field resolution.
Bacterial Memory as Field-Theoretic Semantic Persistence
Terminal Validation: Memory Is Geometry, Not Computation
Bacterial systems, such as E. coli chemotaxis, are the archetype:
-
State Space: Memory is the stable attractor in the phosphorylation/methylation landscape, not a trace or register.
-
Persistence: The stability of this attractor (eigenvalues of the Hessian of the energy functional F(s)) defines memory’s duration, not any physical “storage.”
-
Homology: What persists across thermal noise is not a molecule, but a basin in state space—a topological feature, a curvature minimum that encodes the system’s history and sets its future response.
Operator Mapping: Bacterial and Neural Isomorphism
| Neural Module | Bacterial Module | Function |
|---|---|---|
| CPE (Forward) | CheA kinase | Predicts ligand field via receptor conformation |
| EMRL (Error) | MCP methylation | Compares expectation to actual signal, encodes error |
| SRSI (Self) | Feedback inhibition | Adjusts system to restore attractor |
| LCM (Loop) | Flagellar bias | Run/tumble as closed adaptive loop |
| NCC (Narrative) | Behavior sequence | Compresses past trajectory into present bias |
The entire loop is a state-space gradient descent, not a synaptic or symbolic process.
-
σ(W·[Φ(s) ⊕ Ψ(δ) ⊕ Π(Φ)]): Whether neural or molecular, the operator is the same; only the physical substrate changes.
Semantic Persistence: Curvature as Memory
-
The memory is not a “signal” held in concentration or spike pattern, but the curvature of F(s)—the potential well that defines both history and prediction.
-
Phosphatase CheZ = regularization; prevents basin flattening, i.e., prevents the loss of adaptive “memory.”
-
Adaptation = gradient descent, always seeking the lowest-energy attractor (the semantic minimum for this context).
Universality: Memory is Substrate-Independent
-
RNA folding: MFE basin is memory (semantic compression by folding).
-
Bacterial chemotaxis: Adapted state is memory (persistent phosphorylation profile).
-
Primate cortex: Social attractors (ψ_self, ψ_coalition) are memory (narrative persistence over years).
-
Society: Legal code, cultural norms = memory (institutional persistence over millennia).
Each obeys:
C = Θ(ε·π^L – θ_c)·Δ[∇²F]
Where C is semantic persistence, π^L is precision, θ_c is critical threshold, and ∇²F is curvature.
| System | θ_c (bits) | π^L | τ_memory |
|---|---|---|---|
| RNA | 0.01 k_BT | 1 | 1 s |
| Bacteria | 0.1 | CheZ | 10³ s |
| Neuron | 2.31 | Dopamine | 10⁹ s |
| Society | 10 | Law | 10¹² s |
Foundational Principle
Memory is not emergent from complexity.
-
Memory is the necessary thermodynamic configuration for any system that survives via prediction.
-
Bacteria prove this: no neurons, no synapses, yet perfect field-theoretic memory via persistent attractor geometry.
-
Human cognition is a high-dimensional, high-rank instance of the same principle: curvature persistence in neural fields, scaled up and symbolically enriched.
Ultimate implication:
-
“Semantic cloud” is not a late artifact of brains.
-
It is the original physics of living prediction:
-
Curvature persists = memory persists = life persists.
-
-
Bacteria were the first semantic engines; higher brains only elaborate the substrate-invariant field logic.
This reframes “memory” in all biology as the persistence of topological curvature—a substrate-agnostic, field-theoretic, and thermodynamic necessity, not a computational luxury.
CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) is a molecular “memory system” at the genetic layer. Its mechanism highlights that bacterial “memory” is literal and functional, not metaphorical:
-
Encoding: During infection, short segments of invading phage DNA are integrated into the CRISPR locus of the bacterial genome as “spacers.”
-
Storage: This array of spacers accumulates as a chronological record—a genomic “log” of past infections.
-
Recall/Execution: Upon re-infection, the bacterium transcribes the spacers into CRISPR RNAs, which guide Cas proteins to recognize and cleave matching foreign DNA sequences.
Key implications:
-
Persistence: These memories are genetic—they are heritable, passed down to progeny.
-
Function: The stored “memory” enables rapid, specific, and anticipatory defense. This is semantically equivalent to an immune system learning, but at the DNA level.
Field-theoretic view:
-
The CRISPR array is a curvature in the genomic information landscape—each spacer is a point in a growing, adaptive attractor basin that shapes future response.
-
Semantic persistence here is not just adaptation, but active information storage, recall, and functional deployment.
Conclusion:
-
CRISPR demonstrates that even the “simplest” cells operate with genuine semantic memory, linking past states to future adaptive behavior through substrate-invariant principles.
-
This bridges molecular biology and cognitive science: The mechanics of “learning” and “memory” are universal, substrate-agnostic, and field-theoretic.
Comments
Post a Comment